What quality review is for
Risk-of-bias and quality assessment workflows help teams judge study limitations systematically. Coventra gives structure, storage, conflict handling, comments, summaries, and supported plot generation, but the assessment judgment remains a human methodological decision.
Generic assessment workflow
- Create or select a legally cleared template.
- Record study-level or domain-level judgments.
- Add comments or notes for supporting rationale.
- Compare independent assessments where required.
- Resolve conflicts before final synthesis.
- Review summaries before using judgments in analysis or GRADE.
Template boundaries
Coventra does not bundle copied RoB1/RoB2, ROBINS, QUADAS, JBI, AXIS, or other proprietary wording. The app provides generic infrastructure and legally cleared template support.
Only upload assessment wording, scoring instructions, and domain definitions your team is allowed to use.
Assessment records
- Study identifier and template/domain fields.
- Reviewer judgment.
- Supporting rationale or notes.
- Conflict status where independent assessments differ.
- Resolution data once a lead or team process resolves the disagreement.
RoB plots
Risk-of-bias plot generation is available through the risk/quality workflow where data and templates support it. Generated plots should be checked before manuscript use.
- Confirm domain order.
- Confirm color/legend mapping.
- Confirm included studies and outcome scope.
- Export or save the plot with the final assessment dataset.
Validation and audit
Validation can run at row, study, or project level. It helps find missing fields, inconsistent values, and readiness issues before export or analysis.
- Use the validation report before final handoff.
- Check audit logs for assessment changes when disagreements arise.
- Keep final assessment records aligned with GRADE certainty judgments.
How quality review connects to analysis
Risk-of-bias judgments can inform sensitivity analyses, GRADE certainty assessment, study interpretation, and manuscript discussion. They should be completed before final interpretation, even if statistical runs are technically possible earlier.
Comments and conflict resolution
Risk-of-bias conflict comments can be used to ask why a judgment was selected, point to source text, or request clarification before resolution.